For Christmas I got an intriguing present from a friend - my really own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (great title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has glowing evaluations.

Yet it was entirely written by AI, with a few simple prompts about me provided by my friend Janet.

It's an intriguing read, and uproarious in parts. But it likewise meanders rather a lot, and is someplace in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It mimics my chatty design of composing, however it's likewise a bit repetitive, and very verbose. It might have surpassed Janet's prompts in collecting data about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading technology journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a strange, repetitive hallucination in the kind of my cat (I have no family pets). And there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of business online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the primary executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually sold around 150,000 personalised books, mainly in the US, since rotating from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long ₤ 26. The company utilizes its own AI tools to create them, based upon an open source large language design.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who created it, can purchase any more copies.

There is currently no barrier to anybody creating one in anyone's name, consisting of stars - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around violent material. Each book contains a printed disclaimer stating that it is imaginary, produced by AI, and created "solely to bring humour and delight".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the firm, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is intended as a "personalised gag gift", and the books do not get offered further.

He wishes to expand his range, creating various genres such as sci-fi, and perhaps offering an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted form of consumer AI - selling AI-generated goods to human consumers.

It's likewise a bit scary if, akropolistravel.com like me, you compose for a living. Not least since it probably took less than a minute to generate, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound simply like me.

Musicians, oke.zone authors, artists and actors worldwide have expressed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then produce comparable material based upon it.

"We need to be clear, when we are discussing information here, we really mean human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to regard developers' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is photos. It's works of art. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to learn how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a song including AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had actually not granted it. It didn't stop the track's developer trying to choose it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were fake, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not think using generative AI for imaginative purposes need to be prohibited, but I do think that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on individuals's work without approval should be banned," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be extremely effective however let's construct it fairly and relatively."

OpenAI says Chinese rivals utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: akropolistravel.com The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually chosen to obstruct AI developers from trawling their online material for training purposes. Others have actually decided to team up - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for instance.

The UK federal government is considering an overhaul of the law that would allow AI designers to utilize creators' content on the internet to assist establish their models, unless the rights holders decide out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "madness".

He explains that AI can make advances in locations like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and destroying the incomes of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is likewise highly versus eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth creators, 2.4 million jobs and a great deal of joy," says the Baroness, who is also a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is undermining among its finest carrying out markets on the vague guarantee of growth."

A government spokesperson said: "No move will be made up until we are absolutely positive we have a useful plan that delivers each of our goals: increased control for best holders to assist them certify their material, access to high-quality product to train leading AI models in the UK, and more openness for right holders from AI developers."

Under the UK federal government's brand-new AI strategy, a national data library consisting of public data from a wide variety of sources will likewise be made available to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal rules to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to boost the safety of AI with, to name a few things, firms in the sector required to share details of the workings of their systems with the US government before they are launched.

But this has actually now been rescinded by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do rather, however he is said to desire the AI sector to deal with less regulation.

This comes as a variety of suits versus AI companies, and particularly versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been taken out by everyone from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They declare that the AI firms broke the law when they took their material from the web without their consent, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "fair use" and are for that reason exempt. There are a variety of aspects which can make up reasonable use - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it gathers training information and whether it must be paying for it.

If this wasn't all sufficient to contemplate, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being the most downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it developed its innovation for a fraction of the cost of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's current dominance of the sector.

When it comes to me and a profession as an author, I believe that at the moment, if I really want a "bestseller" I'll still need to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weakness in generative AI tools for larger jobs. It is complete of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be quite hard to check out in parts due to the fact that it's so long-winded.

But offered how quickly the tech is progressing, I'm not exactly sure for how long I can stay confident that my substantially slower human writing and editing skills, are better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest advancements in global innovation, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the globe.

Outside the UK? Register here.